-
Black, J. {concurring in reversal). The appeal board’s decision is sufficiently outlined in Justice Smith’s opinion. The board is the final fact-finder under the statute, and I find no serious claim that the board did not have before it sufficient proof to ■justify its factual findings. This leaves only the question, one of law, whether such findings justified the board’s determination that these claimants were employed “at a separate ‘establishment’.”
*136 Looking at the Park Case (355 Mich 103) I bold that tbe board was so justified. My vote is accordingly cast to reverse and remand for entry of order affirming tbe appeal board’s decision.
Document Info
Docket Number: Calendar 3-5, Docket 51,033, 51,242, 51,243
Citation Numbers: 142 N.W.2d 649, 378 Mich. 119, 1966 Mich. LEXIS 69
Judges: Black, Kavanagh, Souris, Adams, Smith, Dethmers, O'Hara, Kelly
Filed Date: 6/8/1966
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/10/2024