Manistique Lumbering Co. v. Griswold ( 1886 )

Champlin, J.

This case only differs from the case of the-same plaintiff against John L. Witter, ante, p. 625, in the fact that the Chicago Lumbering Company had no office in the-township of Hiawatha, which, under the facts, we think is-immaterial. In all other respects the records in the two cases are the same,- and the decision in that case necessarily rules this. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the-judgment of the circuit court is

Reversed, and a new trial ordered.

The other Justices concurred.