Hinkley v. Wabash Railway Co. , 165 Mich. 475 ( 1911 )

Moore, J.

A decision was rendered in this case in September last. The opinion is found in 162 Mich. 546 (127 N. W. 668). Later a reargument was ordered. We have again considered the ease, and still think the judgment should be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion to which reference has been made.

Judgment is affirmed.

Ostrander, O. J., and Hooker, McAlvay, Brooke, Blair, and Stone, JJ., concurred.