People of Michigan v. Stephen Michael Bieszka ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • Order                                                                           Michigan Supreme Court
    Lansing, Michigan
    December 28, 2020                                                                   Bridget M. McCormack,
    Chief Justice
    161838                                                                                   David F. Viviano,
    Chief Justice Pro Tem
    Stephen J. Markman
    Brian K. Zahra
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,                                                      Richard H. Bernstein
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                                                         Elizabeth T. Clement
    Megan K. Cavanagh,
    Justices
    v                                                          SC: 161838
    COA: 349349
    Allegan CC: 16-019842-FC
    STEPHEN MICHAEL BIESZKA,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    _________________________________________/
    On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 18, 2020 judgment
    of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on
    the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1).
    The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this order
    addressing: (1) whether the trial court clearly erred by determining that the defendant failed
    to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the victim consented to the sexual acts at
    issue; and (2) whether the 14-year-old victim was legally capable of consenting to the
    sexual acts in any event. See MCL 750.520d(1)(a) (“A person is guilty of criminal sexual
    conduct in the third degree if the person engages in sexual penetration with another person
    and if any of the following circumstances exist . . . (a) That other person is at least 13 years
    of age and under 16 years of age.”); People v Starks, 
    473 Mich. 227
    , 230, 235 (2005)
    (“[C]onsent must be given by one who is legally capable of giving consent to the act,” and
    “[b]ecause a thirteen-year-old child cannot consent to sexual penetration, consent by such
    a victim is not a defense to the crime of assault with intent to commit criminal sexual
    conduct involving sexual penetration.”); cf. MCL 28.722(w)(iv) (“This subparagraph does
    not apply if the court determines that the victim consented to the conduct constituting the
    violation, that the victim was at least 13 years of age but less than 16 years of age at the
    time of the offense, and that the individual is not more than 4 years older than the victim.”).
    In addition to the brief, the appellant shall electronically file an appendix conforming to
    MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page
    numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall file a supplemental brief
    within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. The appellee shall also
    electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use of the appendix
    filed by the appellant. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant within 14 days of
    being served with the appellee’s brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of
    their application papers.
    2
    The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense
    Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups
    interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for
    permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
    I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
    foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
    December 28, 2020
    a1222
    Clerk
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 161838

Filed Date: 12/28/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/30/2020