Keyon Harrison v. Curtis Vanderkooi ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •             If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to
    revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.
    STATE OF MICHIGAN
    COURT OF APPEALS
    DENISHIO JOHNSON,                                                  FOR PUBLICATION
    November 21, 2019
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    V                                                                  No. 330536
    Kent Circuit Court
    CURTIS VANDERKOOI, ELLIOTT BARGAS,                                 LC No. 14-007226-NO
    and CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    KEYON HARRISON,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    V                                                                  No. 330537
    Kent Circuit Court
    CURTIS VANDERKOOI and CITY OF GRAND                                LC No. 14-002166-NO
    RAPIDS,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    ON REMAND
    Before: BOONSTRA, P.J., and O’BRIEN and LETICA, JJ.
    LETICA, J. (concurring).
    I reluctantly concur. Reviewing the federal and state caselaw relied upon by the majority,
    I cannot disagree with its conclusion that photographing and fingerprinting are not searches
    under the Fourth Amendment. I am likewise constrained by this Court’s prior decisions and the
    -1-
    parties’ earlier framing of the issues to address their current claim as solely a facial challenge.1
    Unbounded by these limitations, I would reach a different conclusion. 2
    /s/ Anica Letica
    1
    I was not an original member of the panel that decided these cases.
    2
    The city has since modified its P&P policy to require a Terry [v Ohio, 
    392 U.S. 1
    ; 
    88 S. Ct. 1868
    ;
    
    20 L. Ed. 2d 889
    (1968),] detainee’s consent before fingerprinting him or her and to recognize the
    protections afforded under the Child Identification and Protection Act, MCL 722.771 et seq. The
    act prohibits a governmental unit from fingerprinting a child with limited exceptions. MCL
    722.773; MCL 722.774. A governmental unit includes “any political subdivision of the state” as
    well as “an authorized representative of . . . any political subdivision of the state[.]” MCL
    722.772(e). A child is “any person under 17 years of age.” MCL 722.772(a). The act permits a
    governmental unit to “fingerprint a child if fingerprints are voluntarily given with the written
    permission of the child and parent or guardian, upon the request of a law enforcement officer, to
    aid in a specific criminal investigation.” MCL 722.774(1)(d). “Only 1 set of prints shall be
    taken and, upon completion of the investigation, the law enforcement agency shall return the
    fingerprint cards to the parent or guardian of the child.” 
    Id. -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 330537

Filed Date: 11/21/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/22/2019