Mathis v. Interstate Motor Freight System , 73 Mich. App. 602 ( 1977 )


Menu:
  • 73 Mich. App. 602 (1977)
    252 N.W.2d 842

    MATHIS
    v.
    INTERSTATE MOTOR FREIGHT SYSTEM

    Docket No. 28032.

    Michigan Court of Appeals.

    Decided February 3, 1977.

    Reamon, Williams, Klukowski & Craft, P.C., for plaintiff.

    Warner, Norcross & Judd (by William K. Holmes and Gregory G. Prasher), for defendant.

    Before: BEASLEY, P.J., and R.B. BURNS and J.H. GILLIS, JJ.

    PER CURIAM.

    The trial court granted defendant an accelerated and/or summary judgment in a suit by plaintiff to recover no-fault personal protection insurance benefits from defendant. Plaintiff appeals and we affirm.

    Plaintiff was employed by defendant as a dock *603 man. He fell and injured his left knee and leg while unloading freight from a semi-trailer.

    Plaintiff received workmen's compensation benefits. He applied for benefits under the no-fault act. MCLA 500.3101 et seq.; MSA 24.13101 et seq.

    The trial judge held that workmen's compensation benefits were plaintiff's exclusive remedy. MCLA 418.101 et seq.; MSA 17.237(101) et seq.

    The Supreme Court in Solakis v Roberts, 395 Mich 13, 20; 233 NW2d 1, 4 (1975), said: "When an employee's injury is within the scope of the act, workmen's compensation benefits are the exclusive remedy against the employer."

    Affirmed. Costs to defendant.