Holbrook v. Curtin ( 2020 )

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CAMERON HOLBROOK, #382196, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 2:13-CV-11235 HONORABLE SEAN F. COX S. L. Burt, Respondent. __________________________________/ ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration concerning the Court’s February 27, 2020 opinion and order denying his federal habeas petition. The Court also denied a certificate of appealability and denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds no reason to reconsider its decision. A motion for reconsideration which presents issues already ruled upon by the Court, either expressly or by reasonable implication, will not be granted. See Hence v. Smith, 49 F. Supp. 2d 547, 550 (E.D. Mich. 1999); Czajkowski v. Tindall & Assoc., P.C., 967 F. Supp. 951, 952 (E.D. Mich. 1997). Petitioner raises such issues in his motion. He also fails to meet his burden of showing a palpable defect by which the Court has been misled or his burden of showing that a different disposition must result from a correction thereof, as required by Local Rule 7.1(h)(3). Accordingly, the Court denies Petitioner’s motion. No further pleadings should be filed in this matter. This case remains closed. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Sean F. Cox SEAN F. COX UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: April 1, 2020