CASE CLOSED ALL ENTRIES MUST BE MADE IN 18-12471 Burnett v. Jenkins ( 2021 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Michael Burnett, Plaintiff, Case No. 19-cv-13513 v. Judith E. Levy United States District Judge Amie Jenkins, et al., Mag. Judge Patricia T. Morris Defendants. ________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [40] Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris’ Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 40) recommending the Court deny as moot Plaintiff Michael Burnett’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 37.) The parties were required to file specific written objections, if any, within fourteen days of service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The Court has nevertheless carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concurs in the reasoning and result. Accordingly, The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 40) is ADOPTED; and Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint (ECF No. 37) is DENIED AS MOOT.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 10, 2021 s/Judith E. Levy Ann Arbor, Michigan JUDITH E. LEVY United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on November 10, 2021. s/William Barkholz WILLIAM BARKHOLZ Case Manager 1 By failing to object to the Report and Recommendation, the parties have forfeited any further right of appeal. (See ECF No. 40, PageID.525.) See United States v. Wandahsega, 924 F.3d 868, 878 (6th Cir. 2019); Berkshire v. Beauvais, 928 F.3d 520, 530 (6th Cir. 2019); Jones v. Vilsack, 861 F. App’x 58, 63 (6th Cir. 2021).