Pierce v. Washtenaw County Jail ( 2023 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ROGER PIERCE, Case No. 22-12786 Plaintiff, F. Kay Behm v. United States District Judge WASHTENAW CO. JAIL, et al., Curtis Ivy United States Magistrate Judge Defendants. ____________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S OCTOBER 20, 2023 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 74) Currently before the court is Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy’s October 20, 2023 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 74). Magistrate Judge Ivy recommends denying Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No. 49). The court is fully advised in the premises and has reviewed the record and the pleadings. Neither party has filed objections. “[T]he failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report[] releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter.” Hall v. Rawal, 2012 WL 3639070 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2012) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). The court nevertheless agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s recommended disposition. Therefore, the court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 74) and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (ECF 49). SO ORDERED. Date: November 9, 2023 s/F. Kay Behm F. Kay Behm United States District Judge