sharyn-hartwig-relator-v-traverse-care-center-and-minnesota-counties ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                 STATE OF MINNESOTA
    IN SUPREME COURT
    A14-0090
    Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals                                          Page, J.
    Sharyn Hartwig,
    Relator,
    vs.                                                             Filed: August 13, 2014
    Office of Appellate Courts
    Traverse Care Center and Minnesota
    Counties Intergovernmental Trust,
    Respondents,
    Continental Life Insurance, Midway Medical
    Clinic/Steven P. Radjenovich, D. O.,
    Heartland Orthopedic Specialists,
    Intervenors.
    ________________________
    DeAnna M. McCashin, Schoep & McCashin, Chtd., Alexandria, Minnesota, for relator.
    Timothy P. Jung, David M. Bateson, Peter D. Stiteler, Lind, Jensen, Sullivan & Peterson,
    P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondents.
    Susan L. Naughton, League of Minnesota Cities, Saint Paul, Minnesota, for amici curiae
    League of Minnesota Cities, Association of Minnesota Counties, Minnesota Association
    of Townships, and Hennepin County.
    Charlene K. Feenstra, Kalli M. Bennett, Heacox, Hartman, Koshmrl, Cosgriff & Johnson,
    P.A., Saint Paul, Minnesota, for amicus curiae Workers’ Compensation Reinsurance
    Association.
    ________________________
    1
    SYLLABUS
    The phrase “old age and survivor insurance benefits,” as used in 
    Minn. Stat. § 176.101
    , subd. 4 (2012), refers to social security benefits under the Social Security Act,
    
    42 U.S.C. §§ 401-34
     (2012).
    Reversed and remanded.
    OPINION
    PAGE, Justice.
    Relator Sharyn Hartwig was a certified nursing assistant employed by respondent
    Traverse Care Center (Traverse) when she sustained various work-related injuries
    between September 4, 2005, and May 5, 2010. Hartwig has been permanently and totally
    disabled since May 5, 2010, and has been receiving workers’ compensation benefits since
    that date. Hartwig began receiving a retirement annuity from the Public Employees
    Retirement Association (PERA) on August 1, 2012. See generally Minn. Stat. ch. 353
    (2012). She has not applied for or received any disability benefits from PERA. At some
    point, Hartwig began receiving federal social security retirement benefits. The statute
    provides that once Traverse paid $25,000 in permanent total disability benefits, Traverse
    was entitled, under 
    Minn. Stat. § 176.101
    , subd. 4 (2012), to offset Hartwig’s permanent
    total disability benefits by the amount of her social security retirement benefits. The
    $25,000 offset trigger was reached on March 8, 2011.
    The parties disagreed, however, as to whether Traverse was entitled to apply the
    subdivision 4 offset to Hartwig’s PERA retirement benefits. Hartwig therefore filed a
    petition to challenge Traverse’s right to apply the subdivision 4 offset to her PERA
    2
    retirement benefits. Without holding a hearing, the compensation judge granted Traverse
    the offset. The compensation judge concluded that public employee retirement benefits
    are within the meaning of “government disability benefits,” as that term is defined in
    
    Minn. R. 5222
    .0100, subp. 4 (2013) (emphasis added).1
    The WCCA disagreed with the compensation judge’s interpretation of 
    Minn. R. 5222
    .0100, subp. 4, but nonetheless affirmed. Hartwig v. Traverse Care Ctr. & Minn.
    Cntys. Intergovernmental Trust, 
    2013 WL 7017758
    , at *2, *5 (Minn. WCCA Dec. 23,
    2013). The WCCA concluded based, in part, on its past decisions allowing an offset for
    public employee retirement benefits, that Hartwig’s PERA retirement annuity was an
    “old age and survivor insurance benefit[ ].” 
    Id.
     at *4-5 (citing Kramer v. City of St. Paul,
    33 Minn. Workers’ Comp. Dec. 425 (WCCA 1981), Wicks v. City of S. St. Paul, 
    1988 WL 216735
     (Minn. WCCA Nov. 18, 1988), and Adamski v. Kenneth Setterholm’s Farm,
    58 Minn. Workers’ Comp. Dec. 119, 121 (WCCA 1998)).
    Before us, Hartwig argues, as did the employee in Ekdahl v. Independent School
    District #213, __ N.W.2d __, A14-0089 (Minn. August 13, 2014), that 
    Minn. Stat. § 176.101
    , subd. 4, does not permit permanent total disability benefits to be offset by
    public employee pension benefits. In Ekdahl, we held that the term “old age and survivor
    insurance benefits,” as used in 
    Minn. Stat. § 176.101
    , subd. 4, refers only to federal social
    1
    Minnesota Rule 5222.0100, subpart 4, provides: “ ‘Government disability
    benefits’ means disability benefits paid by any government disability program within the
    meaning of Minnesota Statutes, section 176.101, subdivision 4. It includes, but is not
    limited to, social security disability benefits, old age and survivor benefits, fire relief
    association benefits, police relief association benefits, and public employee’s retirement
    benefits.” 
    Minn. R. 5222
    .0100, subp. 4 (2013).
    3
    security benefits received by an injured worker pursuant to the Social Security Act, 
    42 U.S.C. §§ 401-34
     (2012), and not to government-service pension benefits. As a result,
    we held that the offset in 
    Minn. Stat. § 176.101
    , subd. 4, for “old age and survivor
    insurance benefits” does not apply to an employee’s non-social security pension benefits.
    Because Ekdahl controls our decision here, we reverse and remand to the WCCA for
    further proceedings consistent with this opinion.2
    Reversed and remanded.
    2
    Like Ekdahl, Hartwig raises an equal protection claim. For the same reasons we
    did not address Ekdahl’s constitutional claim, we do not address Hartwig’s constitutional
    claim.
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A14-90

Filed Date: 8/13/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/1/2016