-
Gilfillan, C. J. As the facts are found by the court below, the case, so far as concerns the question of usury, is not distinguishable
*195 from Acheson v. Chase, 28 Minn. 211, and Jordan v. Humphrey, 31 Minn. 495. Those decisions are followed in this case.Judgment affirmed.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 33 Minn. 194, 22 N.W. 295, 1885 Minn. LEXIS 40
Judges: Gilfillan
Filed Date: 2/6/1885
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024