Hansen v. Great Northern Railway Co. , 1914 Minn. LEXIS 811 ( 1914 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    This is a personal injury action in which, after a verdict for plaintiff, defendant moved in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. The motion for judgment was denied, but a new trial granted on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict. Defendant appealed from the order.

    Following Kommerstad v. Great Northern Ry. Co. supra, page 297, 146 N. W. 975, the appeal is dismissed.

Document Info

Docket Number: Nos. 18,620 — (83)

Citation Numbers: 146 N.W. 976, 1914 Minn. LEXIS 811, 125 Minn. 524

Filed Date: 4/24/1914

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/10/2024