Op. Atty. Gen. 852 (Cr. Ref. 817, 851) ( 2004 )


Menu:
  • GOVERNMENT DATA: PROPERTY APPRAISALS: Data Practices classification of property
    appraisals done for purposes of acquisition discussed. 
    Minn. Stat. §§ 13.44
    , 117.036 (Supp.
    2003).
    852
    (Cr. Ref. 817, 851)
    April 13, 2004
    Carol Molnau
    Lt. Governor/Commissioner
    Minnesota Department of Transportation
    395 John Ireland Boulevard
    St. Paul, MN 55155-1899
    Dear Commissioner Molnau:
    Thank you for your letter dated March 9, 2004.
    FACTS AND BACKGROUND
    You state that a newspaper reporter recently requested from the Minnesota Department of
    Transportation (MnDOT) copies of all appraisals held by MnDOT pertaining to certain parcels
    of property that were in the process of being acquired by MnDOT through eminent domain
    procedures. The reporter was not an owner of any of the land in question and did not appear to
    be acting on behalf of any landowner. MnDOT staff provided the reporter access to appraisals
    that had been presented in a commissioner’s hearing held pursuant to 
    Minn. Stat. § 117.085
    , but
    did not provide access to appraisals which had not been used in the proceedings or otherwise
    shared with the property owners. The reporter then sought the opinion of the Commissioner of
    Administration pursuant to 
    Minn. Stat. § 13.072
     (Supp. 2003) as to the appropriate classification
    of the appraisal data withheld by MnDOT. On February 5, 2004, the Commissioner rendered an
    opinion to the effect that all MnDOT appraisals pertaining to a parcel of property become public
    as soon as any appraisal data is provided to the property owner or presented to the court or
    commissioners in an eminent domain proceeding. Dept. of Admin, Adv. Op. 04-005. Based
    upon these facts you ask, “If a condemning authority possesses multiple appraisals of a piece of
    property that is in the process of being condemned and if the condemning authority shares one or
    more of the appraisals with the landowner, what is the status of the remaining appraisals during
    the pendency of the condemnation process?”
    Carol Molnau
    April 13, 2004
    Page 2
    LAW AND ANALYSIS
    1.     Generally
    
    Minn. Stat. § 13.44
    , subd. 3(a) (2002) provides:
    Subd. 3. Real property; appraisal data. (a) Confidential or protected
    nonpublic data. Estimated or appraised values of individual parcels of real
    property which are made by personnel of the state, its agencies and departments,
    or a political subdivision or by independent appraisers acting for the state, its
    agencies and departments, or a political subdivision for the purpose of selling or
    acquiring land through purchase or condemnation are classified as confidential
    data on individuals or protected nonpublic data.1
    (Emphasis added.)
    
    Minn. Stat. § 13.44
    , subd. 3(b) (Supp. 2003), however, provides certain exceptions to the
    protections offered by paragraph (a):
    (b)    Public data. The data made confidential or protected nonpublic
    by the provisions of paragraph (a) shall become public upon the
    occurrence of any of the following:
    (1)    the negotiating parties exchange appraisals
    (2)    the data are submitted to a court appointed condemnation commissioner;
    (3)    the data are presented in court in condemnation proceedings;
    (4)    the negotiating parties enter into an agreement for the purchase and
    sale of the property; or
    (5)    the data are submitted to the owner under section 117.036.
    1
    This opinion focuses solely on the provisions of 
    Minn. Stat. § 13.44
    , subd. 3. It does not
    attempt to analyze what Rules of Civil Procedure, if any, may impact the status of the appraisals
    during a condemnation proceeding.
    Carol Molnau
    April 13, 2004
    Page 3
    First, as noted by Commissioner Brian Lamb, the language in Section 13.44, subd. 3 can
    easily be interpreted in more than one way. First, it can be read in the manner read by the
    Commissioner where all appraisals become public when any of the triggering events in
    Section 13.44, subd. 3(b) takes place with respect to any one appraisal. Alternatively, it can be
    interpreted to mean that only the appraisal that triggers one of the exceptions of Section 13.44,
    subd. 3(b) becomes public when the triggering event occurs.
    2.     Legislative History
    We have attempted to locate the legislative history of Section 13.44, subd. 3 to shed some
    light on the legislature’s intent in enacting the law. Unfortunately, we were unable to locate any
    information relative to the enactment of the law. We were able to locate some legislative
    history, however, with respect to the amendment enacted in 2003 which added clause (5) to
    Section 13.44, subd. 3(b).
    During the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on April 1, 2003, the amendment adding
    clause (5) was discussed. The amendment also proposed enactment of 
    Minn. Stat. § 117.036
    ,
    which generally requires public authorities to obtain “at least one appraisal” for any property
    proposed to be acquired through condemnation. 
    Minn. Stat. § 117.036
    , subd. 2 (Supp. 2003).
    That section further requires the public authority to provide the property owner with a copy of
    “the appraisal.” The author of the Senate bill, Senator Don Betzold stated that, under the then-
    current law, the Minnesota Department of Transportation was unable to provide property owners
    with copies of appraisals because they were considered confidential data. The purpose of the bill
    was to enable public authorities to share appraisal data with property owners so they could
    understand the basis of the offer and to hopefully reach an agreement with the acquiring
    authority without having to resort to litigation. A bill amending Section 13.44, subd. 3(b)(5) and
    adopting section 117.036 was ultimately enacted by the legislature.
    3.     
    Minn. Stat. § 13.44
    , subd. 3(b)(2), (3), and (5)
    As noted above, clause (5), as well as clauses (2) and (3), refers to the disclosure of
    “data” when “the data” are “submitted” or “presented” to specified persons or in specified
    proceedings. Because the exceptions in these clauses are for data submitted or presented only in
    certain, specific ways, it appears most reasonable to interpret these clauses to permit public
    disclosure of only the data that are so “submitted” or “presented”. As a result, any data which is
    not submitted to a court appointed condemnation commissioner, not presented in court, and not
    submitted to the landowner pursuant to section 117.036 would not become public data.2
    2
    Clause (5) refers only to “the data” … submitted to the owners under section 117.036. That
    section states, in pertinent part:
    (Footnote Continued on Next Page)
    Carol Molnau
    April 13, 2004
    Page 4
    4.     
    Minn. Stat. § 13.44
    , subd. 3(b)(1) and (4)
    Clause (1) states that confidential appraisal data becomes public when “negotiating
    parties exchange appraisals.” Clause (4) provides that such data becomes public when “the
    negotiating parties enter into an agreement for the purchase or sale of the property.” These
    clauses do not contain the limiting reference to “the data” contained in clauses (2), (3) and (5).
    Thus, it appears that all government appraisals become public if one is shared with the owner in
    an exchange of appraisals or if the parties enter into an agreement for the purchase and sale of
    the property.
    CONCLUSION
    We agree with the Commissioner of Administration that all appraisal data deemed
    confidential or protected nonpublic under the provisions of section 13.44, subd. 3(a) becomes
    public if one of the exceptions set forth in section 13.44, subd. 3(b)(1) or (4) applies to any one
    appraisal.
    (Footnote Continued from Previous Page)
    Before commencing an eminent domain proceeding under this chapter, the
    acquiring authority must obtain at least one appraisal for the property proposed to
    be acquired. In making the appraisal, the appraiser must confer with one or more
    of the owners of the property, if reasonably possible. At least 20 days before
    presenting a petition under section 117.055, the acquiring authority must provide
    the owner with a copy of the appraisal and inform the owner of the owner’s right
    to obtain an appraisal under this section.
    
    Minn. Stat. § 117.036
    , subd. 2(a) (Supp. 2003). As noted, the acquiring authority must obtain
    “at least one appraisal” and provide a copy of “the appraisal” to the owner. In a case where an
    acquiring authority obtains more than one appraisal, the statute does not state that only one
    appraisal must be provided to the landowner. Indeed, the statute is premised on the notion that
    sharing information before having to litigate a case will hopefully result in a negotiated purchase
    rather than a condemnation proceeding. Consequently, if more than one appraisal has been
    obtained by the acquiring authority before providing an appraisal to the owner as required by this
    section, the apparent legislative intent indicates that all of those appraisals should be provided to
    the landowner pursuant to section 117.036, subd. 2.
    Carol Molnau
    April 13, 2004
    Page 5
    It is our further opinion, however, that a property appraisal classified as confidential or
    protected nonpublic by 
    Minn. Stat. § 13.44
    , subd. 3(a) does not become public under
    section 13.44, subd. 3(b)(2), (3), or (5) unless that particular appraisal is submitted to a
    condemnation commissioner; is presented in court in a condemnation proceeding; or is submitted
    to a landowner pursuant to 
    Minn. Stat. § 117.036
    .
    Very truly yours,
    MIKE HATCH
    Attorney General
    State of Minnesota
    KENNETH E. RASCHKE, JR
    Assistant Attorney General
    (651) 297-1141 (Voice)
    (651) 297-1235 (Fax)
    AG: #1199533-v1
    

Document Info

Filed Date: 4/13/2004

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/2/2017