Rebuild America, Inc. v. Tim A. Norris ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
    NO. 2009-CT-01191-SCT
    REBUILD AMERICA, INC.
    v.
    TIM A. NORRIS
    ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
    DATE OF JUDGMENT:                            07/20/2009
    TRIAL JUDGE:                                 HON. PATRICIA D. WISE
    COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:                   HINDS COUNTY CHANCERY COURT
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:                      KIMBERLY PINE TURNER
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:                       STEVE YOUNGER
    NATURE OF THE CASE:                          CIVIL - OTHER
    DISPOSITION:                                 AFFIRMED - 06/16/2011
    MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
    MANDATE ISSUED:
    EN BANC.
    DICKINSON, PRESIDING JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:
    ¶1.    Tim Norris failed to pay the 2005 property taxes on his Jackson restaurant, so in
    August 2006, Sass Muni purchased the property in a tax sale. After Norris did not redeem
    the property within the two-year period provided by statute,1 a tax deed was issued to Sass
    Muni, which then deeded the property to Rebuild America.
    ¶2.    When Rebuild America filed a suit to confirm title, Norris—arguing that he was never
    personally served with notice of the tax sale, as required by Section 27-43-3 2 —moved for
    1
    See Miss. Code Ann. § 27-45-3 (Rev. 2010).
    2
    Miss. Code Ann. § 27-43-3 (Rev. 2010) (“the sheriff shall be required to serve personal
    notice as summons issued from the courts are served”).
    summary judgment to have the tax sale set aside. The chancellor granted summary judgment
    and set the tax sale aside, and Rebuild America appealed, arguing to the Court of Appeals
    that the failure to effect personal service was excusable because the sheriff had made a good-
    faith attempt to effect service, and because Norris received actual notice by mail. The Court
    of Appeals rejected this argument and affirmed the chancellor. We agree with the Court of
    Appeals’ analysis of the issues as reported at Rebuild America, Inc. v. Norris, __ So. 3d __,
    
    2010 WL 3547982
    , at *2 (Miss. Ct. App. Sept. 14, 2010). But we granted certiorari to limit
    the Court of Appeals’ holding to the facts of this case, and to address Rebuild America’s
    request for reimbursement.
    ANALYSIS
    ¶3.    Section 27-43-3 generally requires the chancery clerk to provide notice of tax sale to
    the property’s reputed owner in three forms: (1) by “personal notice as summons issued from
    the courts are served,” (2) by “mail . . . at his usual street address,” and (3) by publication “in
    a public newspaper of the county in which the land is located . . . .” The Court of Appeals,
    citing our opinion in DeWeese Nelson Realty, Inc. v. Equity Services. Co.,3 stated without
    qualification: “All three requirements must be met for the redemption notice to be complete
    and in accordance with the statute.” But the requirement of all three methods of notice is not
    absolute in all cases. Under circumstances where “the clerk and sheriff have complied with
    the duties herein prescribed for them,” the tax sale may be confirmed, even though the owner
    never received actual notice of the tax sale.4 So, although there may be cases where the lack
    3
    DeWeese Nelson Realty, Inc. v. Equity Servs. Co., 
    502 So. 2d 310
     (Miss. 1986).
    4
    Miss. Code Ann. § 27-43-3.
    2
    of personal service will not void a tax sale, this is not one of them. The sheriff did not effect
    personal service as required, despite knowing Norris’s correct home address.
    ¶4.      Rebuild America also argues that it is statutorily entitled to reimbursement of taxes
    paid for previous years, together with statutory interest and penalty.5 This issue is not
    properly before us, and must be decided by a separate claim made pursuant to Section 27-45-
    27(1).
    CONCLUSION
    ¶5.      The decisions of the Court of Appeals and the Chancery Court for the First Judicial
    District of Hinds County are affirmed.
    ¶6.      AFFIRMED.
    WALLER, C.J., CARLSON, P.J., RANDOLPH, LAMAR, KITCHENS,
    CHANDLER AND PIERCE, JJ., CONCUR. KING, J., NOT PARTICIPATING.
    5
    Miss. Code Ann. § 27-45-27(1) (Rev. 2010) (“The purchaser and the holder of the legal title
    under him by descent or purchase, may enforce the lien by bill in chancery, and may obtain a decree
    for the sale of the land in default of payment of the amount within some short time to be fixed by
    the decree.”).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2009-CT-01191-SCT

Filed Date: 7/20/2009

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014