Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. v. Claude Anderson, Jr. ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                       IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
    NO. 2004-CA-01293-SCT
    PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES, INC.,
    HARLAND C. STONECIPHER,
    BROOKS WERKHEISER,
    ARNOLD D. DYRE AND
    DYRE LAW FIRM, PLLC
    v.
    CLAUDE ANDERSON, JR., ET AL.
    DATE OF JUDGMENT:                          02/03/2003
    TRIAL JUDGE:                               HON. JANNIE M. LEWIS
    COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:                 HOLMES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS:                  RICHARD L. JONES
    ROBERT L. GIBBS
    ANNE C. SANDERS
    JOHN B. CLARK
    BRANDI N. SMITH
    SHANDA L. LEWIS
    ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES:                   J. BRAD PIGOTT
    J. DOUGLAS MINOR
    BARRY W. GILMER
    NATURE OF THE CASE:                        CIVIL - CONTRACT
    DISPOSITION:                               AFFIRMED AND REMANDED - 05/12/2005
    MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
    MANDATE ISSUED:
    BEFORE WALLER, P.J., GRAVES AND RANDOLPH, JJ.
    WALLER, PRESIDING JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:
    ¶1.    This matter is on appeal after a ruling by the Circuit Court of Holmes County granting
    the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and for declaratory judgment finding that
    the plaintiffs had no obligation to arbitrate their disputes with the defendants.           Having
    considered the defendants’ appeal (see 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(2) & (3)), we affirm the circuit court
    because the issues raised have been decided against the defendants in Pre-Paid Legal
    Services, Inc. v. Battle, 
    873 So. 2d 79
     (Miss. 2004). We also remand this matter for further
    proceedings.
    DISCUSSION
    ¶2.    Claude Anderson, Jr., and 86 other plaintiffs 1 commenced this action against Pre-Paid
    Legal Services, Inc., Harlan C. Stonecipher, Brooks Werkheiser, Dyre Law Firm, PLLC, and
    Arnold D. Dyre in the Circuit Court of Holmes County, Mississippi.           The plaintiffs claimed
    that Pre-Paid used deceptive marketing practices to lure them into signing a contract for legal
    services that was grossly deficient in comparison to the services they were told that they would
    1
    Ina Alamonte, Sherron Barnes, Bobby Bell, Alex Berry, Joy Braden, Laura Bradley,
    Catherine Brooks, Michelle Brown, Shelby Carmichael, Tracey Crawford, John Cummings,
    Johnny Davis, Keith Davis, Sr., Melton Dawkins, Harriet DeJarnett, Russell Douglass,
    Mildred Eaves, Flora Elerby, Anthony Evans, Debbie Evans, Larry Evans, James Everette,
    John Fairley, Amy Michelle Fisher, Nancey Fondren, Wanda Fox, Ollie Franklin, Beverly
    Gaddis, Barbara Ann Gathright, Lavonne Gordon, Dave Grayson, Tony Ham, Nathan
    Harding, Cennie Hardy, Shirley Harper, Janice Harris, Rebecca Lynne Hasson, Corine
    Hickman, Minnie Inge, Kathy Ivey, Brenda Jones, Chester Jones, Estella Jones, Frances
    Gail Jones, Charlean Lacy, Kenneth Lewis, Angela Little, Wanda Lloyd, Beverly Lockett,
    Marilyn Lott, J. B. Lovett, Mildred Lucas, Joyce McAffee, Latricia McCarty, Cynthia
    McCollum, Sandra McCoy, Anne McCullum, Linda McGill, David McKenzie, Roy
    McKenzie, Gwendolyn Mack, Maggie May, Chevonna Milloy-Bass, Patricia Moody, Paul
    Newell, Ora Nicks, Diane Nobles, Eddie Ott, Jr., Linda Pace, Willie Pace, Eddie Payton,
    Amy Pence, Yalinda Pugh, Dorothy Radcliff, Lou Ross, Gloria Shadwick, Dorothy Smith,
    Patricia Smith, Scottie Starr, Jean Stubbs, Michele Swanner, Derrick Walker, Richard C.
    Wallace, Wendie Williams, Laura Womack, and Shawn T. Young.
    2
    receive. The plaintiffs sought a partial summary judgment and a declaratory judgment that they
    were under no obligation to arbitrate any of these claims against the defendants.
    ¶3.     The defendants responded that all of the contracts entered into by the plaintiffs
    contained an arbitration provision in nine point font on the fifth of six pages as follows:            “K.
    Settlement of Disputes: In the event of a dispute, the parties will agree on an impartial attorney
    who will decide such dispute and that decision will be binding on all parties to such dispute.”
    ¶4.     We have considered this exact arbitration clause on four different occasions.2             See Pre-
    Paid Legal Servs., Inc. v. Battle, 
    873 So. 2d 79
     (Miss. 2004); Pre-Paid Legal Servs., Inc.
    v. Brownlow, 
    874 So. 2d 972
     (Miss. 2004); Dyre Law Firm v. Bradley, 
    874 So. 2d 984
     (Miss.
    2004); Pre-Paid Legal Servs., Inc. v. Mealey, 
    875 So. 2d 1075
     (Miss. 2004).                        In each
    instance, we have held that the contract entered into by the plaintiffs did not have a valid,
    binding arbitration agreement. Battle, 873 So. 2d at 84; Brownlow, 874 So. 2d at 972-73;
    Bradley, 874 So. 2d at 986; Mealey, 875 So. 2d at 1077.
    2
    In fact, the defendants admit in their brief that “[t]his Court has previously ruled in
    four cases involving essentially the same issues under essentially the same facts.”
    3
    CONCLUSION
    ¶5.     Because the issues raised in the appeal have been resolved in earlier cases, we affirm
    the judgment of the Circuit Court of Holmes County, Mississippi, and remand this case for
    further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
    ¶6.     AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.
    SMITH, C.J., EASLEY, CARLSON, GRAVES, DICKINSON AND RANDOLPH,
    JJ., CONCUR. COBB, P.J., DISSENTS WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN OPINION.
    DIAZ, J., NOT PARTICIPATING.
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2004-CA-01293-SCT

Filed Date: 2/3/2003

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014