Hinson v. State , 66 Miss. 532 ( 1889 )

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We find no error in the record. The evidence of what is called antecedent threats was properly excluded on two, grounds:

First, because what is called a threat was no threat • and, second, because no overt act is shown which would have justified its introduction in evidence if it had been a threat.

Judgment affirmed.