Crawford v. Brooks , 41 Miss. 540 ( 1867 )


Menu:
  • Harris, J.,

    delivered the opinion of the court.

    This is an action of assumpsit on a promissory note, to which the defendant pleaded first, the general issue, and second, that a part of the consideration of the note was for goods, &c., won on a horse-race, and void.

    On these pleas there was a jury and verdict for defendant.

    The plaintiff below moved for a new trial, because the verdict of the jury was contrary to the law and evidence; which motion was sustained by the court, and a new trial granted. To which opinion of the court granting a new trial the defendant below excepted, and tendered- his bill of exceptions. The evidence contained in the bill of exceptions showed, that there was included in the amount of said note the price of a pair of boots *541of the value of eight dollars, won by plaintiff Brooks, one of the defendants, on a horse-race.

    By act 1, p. 361, Rev.' Code, all contracts, &c., * * where the whole or any part of the consideration or foundation of such contract, &c., shall be for money or other valuable thing what' ever won, &c., * * * at any game or games whatever, or on any horse-race, &c., * * * shall be utterly void.

    It is impossible to avoid the force of this statute. The proof shows that a part of the consideration of the note sued on was the price of a pair of boots won by one of the plaintiffs off the defendant, on a horse-race. The note, therefore, is declared void by the statute; and this being the only cause of action relied on in the . declaration, it' necessarily follows that no recovery can be had.

    The suggestion by counsel for defendant in error, that this count, on a promissory note, under our system of pleading, may be made to perform the office of a special count, as well as any common count needed, goes beyond the most flexible provisions yet enacted by the legislature.

    Let the judgment of the Circuit Court, granting a new trial in this case, as well as the judgment for the plaintiff below on said new trial, be reversed, and judgment entered here for the plaintiff in error.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 41 Miss. 540

Judges: Harris

Filed Date: 6/15/1867

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024