Olevia Davis v. State of Mississippi; ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •          IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
    NO. 2019-KA-00213-COA
    OLEVIA DAVIS                                                              APPELLANT
    v.
    STATE OF MISSISSIPPI                                                        APPELLEE
    DATE OF JUDGMENT:                          01/10/2019
    TRIAL JUDGE:                               HON. LAWRENCE PAUL BOURGEOIS JR.
    COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:                 HARRISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,
    SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:                    OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER
    BY: GEORGE T. HOLMES
    MOLLIE MARIE McMILLIN
    ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:                     OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
    BY: BARBARA WAKELAND BYRD
    DISTRICT ATTORNEY:                         JOEL SMITH
    NATURE OF THE CASE:                        CRIMINAL - FELONY
    DISPOSITION:                               AFFIRMED - 01/07/2020
    MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
    MANDATE ISSUED:
    BEFORE CARLTON, P.J., WESTBROOKS AND McCARTY, JJ.
    McCARTY, J., FOR THE COURT:
    ¶1.    Olevia Davis was convicted of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He was
    sentenced as a habitual offender to serve eight years in the custody of the Mississippi
    Department of Corrections. Finding no arguable issues for appeal, Davis’s appellate counsel
    filed a brief pursuant to Lindsey v. State, 
    939 So. 2d 743
     (Miss. 2005). Davis was given
    additional time to file a supplemental brief but did not.
    FACTS
    ¶2.    While at the Elks Lodge in Biloxi, Mississippi, for a dance contest, Davis had an
    altercation with another patron. Gerrell Elzy, the security guard at the Lodge, did not witness
    the beginning of the altercation but did see Davis charge another man while brandishing a
    broken bottle. After attempting to calm Davis, Elzy removed him from the premises.
    Outside, Elzy witnessed Davis arguing again with the same man from inside the Lodge. Elzy
    heard Davis say he would be back and then saw him walk across nearby railroad tracks. Elzy
    testified that Davis returned approximately thirty minutes later holding a gun. While Elzy
    was calling 911, he saw Davis fire the gun into the air. Davis left again, walking back across
    the railroad tracks between two houses. Elzy, still on the phone with a 911 operator,
    followed Davis.
    ¶3.    Law enforcement officers arrived quickly, and Elzy identified Davis as the man who
    had fired the gun into the air. Davis was arrested and searched but was not armed. After a
    search, officers found the gun behind the house that Elzy saw Davis run behind.
    ¶4.    Davis testified in his defense that he never had a gun and that Elzy confused him with
    the man from the fight inside the Lodge.
    DISCUSSION
    ¶5.    Here, Davis’s appellate counsel complied with the requirements set forth in Lindsey.
    See Lindsey, 939 So. 2d at 748 (¶18). Davis’s appellate counsel stated that they reviewed the
    following: (a) the reason for the arrest and the circumstances surrounding Davis’s arrest; (b)
    any possible violations of Davis’s right to counsel; (c) the entire trial transcript and contents
    of the record; (d) all rulings of the trial court; (e) possible prosecutorial misconduct; (f) all
    jury instructions; (g) all exhibits, whether admitted into evidence or not; (h) possible
    2
    misapplication of the law in sentencing; (i) the indictment and all of the pleadings in the
    record; (j) any possible ineffective assistance of counsel; and (k) whether the verdict is
    supported by the overwhelming weight of the evidence.
    ¶6.    Our independent and thorough review of the record has not revealed any arguable
    issues that would warrant reversal. See Taylor v. State, 
    162 So. 3d 780
    , 787 (¶18) (Miss.
    2015). Accordingly, we affirm Davis’s conviction and sentence.
    ¶7.    AFFIRMED.
    BARNES, C.J., CARLTON AND J. WILSON, P.JJ., GREENLEE,
    WESTBROOKS, TINDELL, McDONALD, LAWRENCE AND C. WILSON, JJ.,
    CONCUR.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: NO. 2019-KA-00213-COA

Judges: McCarty, McCarty, Barnes, Carlton, Wilson, Greenlee, Westbrooks, Tindell, McDonald, Lawrence, Wilson

Filed Date: 1/7/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/29/2024