Ford v. State ( 2018 )

PER CURIAM.

Michael Ford appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

*890An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).