State v. Martin ( 2018 )

PER CURIAM.

Steven Martin appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction after a jury trial for burglary in the second degree. The evidence was sufficient and there was no other prejudicial error at trial. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).