Davis v. State , 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 432 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    Movant, Elisha J. Davis, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. ED 81193

Citation Numbers: 101 S.W.3d 323, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 432, 2003 WL 1494974

Judges: Crane, Gaertner, Simon

Filed Date: 3/25/2003

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024