State v. Harris ( 2006 )


Menu:
  • Order

    PER CURIAM.

    Roy Harris appeals the trial court’s entry of a sentence and judgment claiming that the State failed to prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of two forgery charges. We find that there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror might have found Harris guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

    The trial court’s entry of judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. WD 66156

Judges: Ellis, Howard, Smith

Filed Date: 12/5/2006

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024