Stack v. State ( 1989 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment on a Rule 27.26 motion. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(j).

    An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

    The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 54115

Filed Date: 2/28/1989

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024