Nishke v. State , 823 S.W.2d 4 ( 1991 )

ORDER

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-eonviction relief. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).