Hunter v. State ( 1993 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary *252hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 62290

Filed Date: 2/2/1993

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024