Smith v. State ( 1992 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary-hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).