Jackson v. State ( 1993 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears.

A written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have prepared a written memorandum for the use of the parties in this case only.

Affirmed per Rule 84.16(b).