Noel v. State ( 1993 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. After reviewing the record, we find the motion court did not clearly err in such denial. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).

We further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion in this matter and dispose by summary order. Rule 30.25(b). We have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their use only, setting forth our reasons for our decision.