-
ORDER
PER CURIAM. We find Defendant is not entitled to plain error review of issues not raised in his Rule 24.035 motion. Further, we find no error of law appears and the findings of fact issued by the motion court in overruling Defendant’s 24.035 motion were not clearly erroneous.
An opinion in this case would serve no precedential purpose; therefore, we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 63698
Citation Numbers: 862 S.W.2d 523, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1580, 1993 WL 402957
Judges: Crandall, Crist, Reinhard
Filed Date: 10/12/1993
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/14/2024