State v. Hollins ( 1994 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    Defendant appeals his convictions for delivery of a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance. Finding no error, we affirm. Further, an opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm with summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 64273

Judges: Crandall, Crist, Reinhard

Filed Date: 3/15/1994

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024