Amos v. State , 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 684 ( 1994 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    Movant appeals the motion court’s denial of his ineffective assistance of counsel claim following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We find no error of law appears, and the findings of fact issued by the motion court in denying Movant’s motion are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5).

    We further find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 64592

Citation Numbers: 873 S.W.2d 956, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 684, 1994 WL 144984

Judges: Crandall, Crist, Reinhard

Filed Date: 4/26/1994

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024