Fanning v. Andres ( 1994 )

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs’ filed a pleading which they labeled “Petition for Damages for Tortious Interference with Contracts.” The trial court sustained defendants’ motions to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action and dismissed the petition with prejudice.

No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.-16(b).

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.