Joseph v. State , 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 917 ( 1994 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    Defendant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after his plea of guilty to distributing a controlled substance near a school. Finding no clear error in such denial, we affirm. We also determine an extended opinion would have no precedential value and affirm by order opinion. Rule 84.-16(b)(2). A memorandum has been given to the parties for their use only.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 64691

Citation Numbers: 882 S.W.2d 153, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 917, 1994 WL 241069

Judges: Crandall, Crist, Reinhard

Filed Date: 6/7/1994

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024