Ball v. State ( 1994 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no pree-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).