Deason v. House of Denmark ( 1994 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employee, Daniel Deason, appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his claim for workers’ compensation.

The decision of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). The motion to strike employee’s brief is denied.