Message
×
loading..

Clark v. State ( 1995 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 66742

Judges: Crahan, Gaertner, Reinhard

Filed Date: 4/25/1995

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024