Johnson v. State ( 1995 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    Movant appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended written opinion. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 67711

Judges: Karohl, Reinhard, White

Filed Date: 10/17/1995

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024