Goldenberg v. Goldenberg ( 1995 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    Wife appeals from the portions of the dissolution decree denying her request for maintenance. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not erroneous; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

    Judgment affirmed.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 68287

Judges: Dowd, Karohl, Reinhard

Filed Date: 12/26/1995

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024