Sexton v. State , 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1833 ( 1997 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM:

    John D. Sexton appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that Mr. Sexton’s motion was untimely filed and, therefore, affirm the motion court’s ruling. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order and have furnished the parties with a memorandum setting forth our reasoning. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. WD 54229

Citation Numbers: 954 S.W.2d 664, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1833, 1997 WL 665466

Judges: Lowenstein, Smart, Stith

Filed Date: 10/28/1997

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024