Hatchett v. Director of Revenue ( 1997 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was arrested for driving while intoxicated after failing to submit to a breath test, and his driving privileges were revoked. Appellant claims his “whatever” response to police officer’s request to submit to a breath test, did not constitute a denial to submit to the test, even though he was informed that any response other than “yes” or “no” would be taken as a refusal.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)