-
ORDER
PER CURIAM. Husband appeals the judgment denying his motion to set aside the judgment termi
*654 nating his parental rights pursuant to Rules 74.06(b)(5) and (b)(6). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 72582
Citation Numbers: 972 S.W.2d 653, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1435, 1998 WL 436564
Judges: Crahan, Crist, Teitelman
Filed Date: 7/31/1998
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/14/2024