-
ORDER
PER CURIAM. Appellant, Michael Babcock, appeals from the judgment, after a trial de novo, finding him guilty of speeding. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.
1 The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
. Respondent’s motion to dismiss appellant’s appeal is denied.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 74287
Citation Numbers: 984 S.W.2d 161, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 2068, 1998 WL 792561
Judges: Ahrens, Crandall, Pudlowski
Filed Date: 11/17/1998
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/14/2024