City of Breckenridge Hills v. Walk ( 2000 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, City of Breckenridge Hills, appeals the trial court’s decision sustaining Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the princi-pies of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).