Whittaker v. State , 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1184 ( 2000 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    Romell Whittaker (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the circuit court denying his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of *261the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. ED 77298

Citation Numbers: 23 S.W.3d 260, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1184, 2000 WL 1051835

Judges: Mooney, Simon, Sullivan

Filed Date: 8/1/2000

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024