Hodges v. State , 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1606 ( 2000 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    James Hodges (Movant) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without a hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on *251appeal and conclude the trial court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. ED 77188

Citation Numbers: 30 S.W.3d 250, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1606, 2000 WL 1617992

Judges: Ahrens, Crandall, Dowd

Filed Date: 10/31/2000

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024