Hawkes v. State , 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 891 ( 2002 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Walter Hawkes (“Movant”) appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would be of no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).