State v. Tiger , 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 51 ( 2004 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pidy Tiger appeals from his conviction of first-degree robbery and armed criminal action. Tiger claims the trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on second-degree robbery. Tiger argues that he presented evidence providing the jury a basis for acquitting him of first-degree robbery and convicting him of the lesser-included offense of second-degree robbery.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).