Moore v. State ( 2012 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Patrick Moore, Jr. appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court did not err in denying Moore’s claim for ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).