Rodgers v. State , 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1024 ( 2012 )

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Cornelius D. Rodgers appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentia-ry hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).