Shepherd v. State , 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1529 ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    Cortez Shepherd appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

    An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: No. ED 98068

Citation Numbers: 386 S.W.3d 912, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1529, 2012 WL 6018040

Judges: Ahrens, Norton, Sullivan

Filed Date: 12/4/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024